Skip to content
Sections
Personal tools
You are here: Home » Projects » cyhist » Cyhist 1996 » Cyhist July 1996 » Cyhist Jul 20 1996 A

Cyhist Jul 20 1996 A

Document Actions
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 1996 23:05:14 -0700
Reply-To: cpsr-history@Sunnyside.COM
Originator: cpsr-history@cpsr.org
Sender: listserv-reply-errors@Sunnyside.COM
Precedence: bulk
From: Community Memory To: "Multiple recipients of list cpsr-history@cpsr.org" Subject: CM> "Vaporware" & MS-DOS.
X-Listprocessor-Version: 9.1 -- List Server by Sunnyside Computing, Inc.
X-Comment: Discussion of history of computing
X-Info: For listserv info write to listserv@cpsr.org with message HELP
X-Message-Id: <1248205034113.LTK.013@cpsr.org>
X-UIDL: 837971719.015
X-Status:
Status: RO
Sender: Ersatzzz@aol.com
Subject: the vapors


To my suggestion that Microsoft is most often
pointed to as a vaporware-meister, John Clarke
wrote "Jonny come lately's if you ask me"--
and no doubt he's right. But if I'm remembering
the New Yorker's profile of Gates some while
back, hasn't the tale now passed into legend
about how Gates and his partner told IBM
that they had an operating system ready for
their forthcoming PC, and that it just needed
a little tinkering... and then wrote DOS in a
matter of months, thus getting in on the
ground floor with a non-existant product, and
deterring IBM from looking elsewhere?

Considering the role of DOS in the history of
personal computing, that's a central example
of vaporware. Or is this apocryphal, a bit of
spin by Gates to make himself seem more
swashbuckling in hindsight?

--Sam Pratt (this story is for New York Mag,
btw)



______________________________________________________________________
Created by sbaldwin
Contributors :
Last modified 2005-09-20 12:58 PM
 

Powered by Plone

This site conforms to the following standards: